Scrum vs. Traditional Project Management

Scrum vs. Traditional Project Management


🔧 Approach & Structure

Aspect Scrum Traditional (Waterfall)

Methodology Agile-based (iterative) Linear, sequential

Phases Sprint-based cycles Defined phases (e.g., Requirements → Design → Build → Test → Deploy)

Flexibility Highly adaptive to change Rigid, hard to change after planning

Planning Rolling wave planning (adjusts with progress) Detailed up-front planning


👥 Team & Roles

Aspect Scrum Traditional

Team Structure Cross-functional, self-organizing Hierarchical

Key Roles Product Owner, Scrum Master, Development Team Project Manager, Functional Managers

Decision-Making Decentralized, collaborative Centralized under Project Manager


📅 Time & Delivery

Aspect Scrum Traditional

Delivery Incremental, at the end of each sprint (1-4 weeks) Final delivery at end of project

Timeline Continuous prioritization and reprioritization Fixed timeline, milestones


📊 Documentation & Requirements

Aspect Scrum Traditional

Requirements Evolving, documented as user stories Fully defined before development

Documentation Minimal, just enough Extensive, comprehensive upfront


✅ Success Factors

Aspect Scrum Traditional

Change Management Embraces change Resists change once plan is set

Risk Management Identified and adapted iteratively Handled during early planning stages

Customer Involvement Continuous feedback loop Limited to beginning and end


🧩 When to Use Each

Use Case Scrum Traditional

Best For Complex, evolving projects (e.g., software dev) Well-defined, predictable projects (e.g., construction)

Team Environment Dynamic, collaborative Stable, top-down

Learn Scrum Master Training in Hyderabad

Read More

The Role of the Scrum Master Explained

What Is Scrum? A Beginner’s Guide

Visit Our Quality Thought Training in Hyderabad

Get Directions

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding Snowflake Editions: Standard, Enterprise, Business Critical

Why Data Science Course?

How To Do Medical Coding Course?