Scrum vs. Traditional Project Management
Scrum vs. Traditional Project Management
🔧 Approach & Structure
Aspect Scrum Traditional (Waterfall)
Methodology Agile-based (iterative) Linear, sequential
Phases Sprint-based cycles Defined phases (e.g., Requirements → Design → Build → Test → Deploy)
Flexibility Highly adaptive to change Rigid, hard to change after planning
Planning Rolling wave planning (adjusts with progress) Detailed up-front planning
👥 Team & Roles
Aspect Scrum Traditional
Team Structure Cross-functional, self-organizing Hierarchical
Key Roles Product Owner, Scrum Master, Development Team Project Manager, Functional Managers
Decision-Making Decentralized, collaborative Centralized under Project Manager
📅 Time & Delivery
Aspect Scrum Traditional
Delivery Incremental, at the end of each sprint (1-4 weeks) Final delivery at end of project
Timeline Continuous prioritization and reprioritization Fixed timeline, milestones
📊 Documentation & Requirements
Aspect Scrum Traditional
Requirements Evolving, documented as user stories Fully defined before development
Documentation Minimal, just enough Extensive, comprehensive upfront
✅ Success Factors
Aspect Scrum Traditional
Change Management Embraces change Resists change once plan is set
Risk Management Identified and adapted iteratively Handled during early planning stages
Customer Involvement Continuous feedback loop Limited to beginning and end
🧩 When to Use Each
Use Case Scrum Traditional
Best For Complex, evolving projects (e.g., software dev) Well-defined, predictable projects (e.g., construction)
Team Environment Dynamic, collaborative Stable, top-down
Learn Scrum Master Training in Hyderabad
Read More
The Role of the Scrum Master Explained
What Is Scrum? A Beginner’s Guide
Visit Our Quality Thought Training in Hyderabad
Comments
Post a Comment